The great fanfare over India’s decision to acquire the French carrier-based Rafale M fighter jet has now died down and the first criticisms have emerged. An anonymous Indian Navy officer has raised concerns about the Rafale M’s suitability for carrier operations, drawing parallels with the earlier MiG-29K acquisition.
The Rafale M’s fixed wings limit its maneuverability and take up valuable deck space, reducing the number of aircraft that can be stationed on India’s carriers, INS Vikramaditya and INS Vikrant. Additionally, the two-seat training variant of the Rafale M isn’t carrier-capable, meaning pilots miss out on essential real-world training for carrier operations, relying instead on simulators.
In contrast, the MiG-29KUB, a two-seat trainer for the MiG-29K, could operate from carriers, offering a more realistic training environment. However, the MiG-29K faced its own issues with crashes, increasing reliance on simulators. The officer noted that the Rafale M, like the MiG-29K, was chosen due to its use by the Indian Air Force, aiming to streamline logistics and reduce training costs.
These compromises in the Rafale M’s design could impact the Navy’s operational readiness, highlighting the challenges of integrating foreign technology into specialized carrier operations. The Navy may need to consider modifications or increased investment in training infrastructure to mitigate these issues.
India’s slow decision-making process in weapons procurement, coupled with errors despite the meticulousness of this process, stems from a complex interplay of bureaucratic, strategic, and historical factors.
At the core of this issue lies the bureaucratic labyrinth of India’s defense acquisition system. The decision-making hierarchy involves multiple layers of approval, from the individual service branches through the Ministry of Defence [MoD], to potentially the Cabinet Committee on Security and even the Finance Ministry.
This multi-tiered system, while intended to ensure accountability and prevent corruption following high-profile scandals like the Bofors scandal in the 1980s, often results in significant delays. The process is further slowed by the lack of a single point of accountability, with decisions passing through numerous hands, leading to duplication of effort and delayed comments or approvals.
The absence of a unified strategic vision has also contributed to this sluggish pace. Each branch of the military has historically pursued its own operational doctrines, leading to disjointed and sometimes conflicting procurement needs. This lack of cohesion can turn weapons acquisition into a reactive, rather than proactive, pursuit, where decisions are driven by immediate shortages or political pressures rather than long-term strategic planning.
Moreover, India’s defense procurement has been plagued by an overcautious approach to avoid past mistakes, which paradoxically leads to new ones. The fear of repeating corruption scandals has resulted in an overly stringent procurement procedure, where the focus often shifts from functionality to fault-finding. This can result in the rejection of potentially beneficial acquisitions or the selection of less optimal systems due to overly specific or unrealistic requirements.
Another layer of complexity comes from India’s international relations and defense partnerships. Historically dependent on Russian arms, India has been diversifying its sources, which introduces new challenges like negotiating technology transfers, dealing with different suppliers’ standards, and managing the political implications of leaning towards one geopolitical bloc over another. This diversification, while strategically necessary, adds layers of negotiation and decision-making time.
The slow pace also reflects India’s economic constraints and budget management. Defense spending as a percentage of GDP has been kept low, leading to financial bottlenecks in funding new acquisitions, especially when coupled with the high costs associated with modern, sophisticated weaponry. This often means that even when decisions are made, the actual procurement can lag due to budgetary limitations, further exacerbating the delay.
Errors in this process are partly due to these systemic issues but also stem from a lack of real-time monitoring and adaptation to changing technological landscapes. Projects can drag on for so long that when finally approved, the technology in question might be nearing obsolescence or already outdated, leading to suboptimal investments or the need for rapid, costly upgrades.
The Indian Navy’s quest to bolster its carrier-based air power has taken a decisive turn with the selection of the Dassault Rafale M, edging out the competition from Boeing’s F/A-18E/F Super Hornet in what has been a prolonged and intense evaluation saga.
Back in 2017, the Navy cast out the net for its Multi-Role Carrier Borne Fighter [MRCBF] program, aiming to arm the newly minted INS Vikrant with a new breed of fighters. The trials, conducted at the Navy’s Shore-Based Test Facility in Goa, were nothing short of a spectacle, with both contenders performing high-stakes ski-jump takeoffs and arrested landings.
Come July 2023, the Defense Acquisition Council gave the green light, or rather, the Acceptance of Necessity for the procurement of 26 Rafale Ms. This decision wasn’t just about picking a jet; it was about strategic foresight, banking on the operational and logistical commonality with the Indian Air Force’s existing Rafale jets. The Rafale M, tailored for the harsh life aboard an aircraft carrier, boasts foldable wings and beefed-up landing gear, ready to handle the rigors of catapult-free operations from India’s STOBAR carriers.
Negotiations were a back-and-forth dance of diplomacy and hard bargaining. By September 2024, India managed to secure a significant price cut, signaling a deal worth around Rs 63,000 crore [about USD 7.6 billion]. This package wasn’t just for the jets but included a suite of weaponry like the long-range Meteor missiles, anti-ship Exocet, and SCALP cruise missiles, alongside logistics, training, and custom modifications for the Indian Navy.
This isn’t your run-of-the-mill arms deal; it’s a government-to-government affair, echoing the 2016 contract for the Indian Air Force’s Rafales. The tally? 22 single-seat and 4 two-seat trainers, with whispers of possibly nabbing a couple of pre-owned Rafale Marines for initial training, offering a win-win scenario for both the French and Indian navies.
This acquisition acts as a stopgap, holding the fort until the indigenous Twin Engine Deck-Based Fighter [TEDBF] matures, expected by 2031. It’s not just about adding teeth to India’s maritime punch; it’s about cementing a strategic alliance with France, adding another layer to their defense partnership in an increasingly tense Indo-Pacific theater.
In the high-stakes arena of naval aviation, the Indian Navy’s decision to potentially transition from the MiG-29K to the Rafale M has sparked a debate that’s as intense as the jets themselves.
The MiG-29K, a Soviet-era stalwart with a Russian pedigree, has been the backbone of India’s carrier-based fighter operations, serving on both INS Vikramaditya and the newly commissioned INS Vikrant. On the flip side, the Rafale M, with its French finesse and advanced technology, promises to elevate the Navy’s capabilities to new heights.
Starting with the MiG-29K, this aircraft has been a workhorse for the Indian Navy since its induction in 2010. It’s an all-weather, multirole fighter, designed to operate from carriers with its strengthened undercarriage and folding wings. However, its service life hasn’t been without turbulence.
Maintenance woes, availability of spare parts, and several high-profile crashes have painted a picture of a fighter struggling to keep pace with modern naval demands. Yet, it’s known for its agility, able to perform in air-to-air and air-to-surface roles with a respectable payload capacity, thanks to its RD-33MK engines.
The Rafale M, meanwhile, brings to the table a more contemporary design, tailored from the ground up for carrier operations. Its active electronically scanned array [AESA] radar, the RBE2, gives it a significant edge in detection and engagement ranges over the MiG-29K’s radar systems.
The Rafale M’s design incorporates a reinforced structure for the stresses of carrier life, including a tail hook for arrested landings and a jump strut for ski-jump takeoffs, aligning perfectly with India’s carrier infrastructure.
In terms of combat capability, the Rafale M is not just about survival; it’s about dominance. Its weapon suite, including the Meteor beyond-visual-range air-to-air missiles, offers a strategic advantage in modern aerial warfare scenarios. The French jet also boasts better avionics and a more comprehensive electronic warfare suite, making it a formidable opponent in any engagement.
Its range and payload capacity might be slightly superior, but on the flip side, the MiG-29K has proven its reliability in specific combat roles, particularly in close-quarters dogfights where its maneuverability shines.
However, the conversation isn’t solely about raw combat power; it’s also about logistics, training, and long-term viability. The Rafale M benefits from the existing Rafale fleet in the Indian Air Force, potentially streamlining maintenance and operational costs. The MiG-29K, despite its issues, has been integrated into the Navy’s operations for over a decade, offering a level of familiarity and operational knowledge that can’t be overlooked.
Both jets are set against the backdrop of India’s strategic naval ambitions in the Indian Ocean region, where the balance between cost, capability, and continuity plays a critical role. The MiG-29K’s days might be numbered with the Rafale M’s arrival, not because of a direct performance gap but due to the technological leaps and strategic advantages the latter offers.
However, the transition won’t be without its challenges, particularly in terms of acclimating pilots to a new platform and integrating it into the existing naval aviation doctrine.
***
Follow us everywhere and at any time. BulgarianMilitary.com has responsive design and you can open the page from any computer, mobile devices or web browsers. For more up-to-date news, follow our Google News, YouTube, Reddit, LinkedIn, and Twitter pages. Our standards: Manifesto & ethical principles.
